North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Summary of the RA situation was Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x?
>Gordon Cook writes: > > [some text deleted] > Then Jeff Barrows makes and interesting and useful point: > > The last time I checked, the _biggest_ argument against using the RA was that > alot of the data is incorrect. I have also heard a lot about work that has > been done to clean up the RA. Is this still the biggest factor? > > -Jeff > The Routing Arbiter Service has two components - the Route Servers (RS) and the Routing Arbiter DataBase (RADB). The RADB is one of the components of the Internet Routing Registry (IRR). Some of the information in the RADB is "historical." It was carried over from the PRDB for purposes of the transition from the NSFNET Backbone Service to the current US Internet Architecture. The RA team has been working with CA*net and ANS to reduce duplicate route objects which are artifacts of the transition. Several months ago, approximately 3000 routes were deleted from the RADB because CA*net worked with us to identify which routes were now being maintained in the CA*net DataBase. Approximately, 1000 route objects have been deleted as a result of a request from ANS more recently. Approximately 20% of the route objects that existed at the time of the transition have been removed. Another area where the RA team has been agressively making efforts to maintain current information is the maintainer objects. On the recommendation of the RIPE routing working group, the EOF and NANOG, the RA team populated the incomplete maintainer objects from information in the InterNIC. The direction that we received from the community was that the maintainers of the data are the only folks authorized to modify the data. The RA team contacted those maintainers and has indicated that the team is ready to make large scale changes in the data in the RADB based on changes authorized by the maintainers of the information. ESnet, Delphi, PIPEX, ANS, internetMCI and CA*net (and probably other organizations) all maintain up-to-date information in the various components of the IRR (RADB included). And because they maintain up-to-date information, that information is useful to them and the rest of the community. The RA team has announced a tool which converts cisco configurations to database format, and the team is willing to work with any organization which wishes to make large scale changes in stale data. --Elise