North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: larger space was: Re: [NIC-....
At 03:23 PM 2/15/96 -0500, Alan B. Clegg wrote: > >How exactly does a larger address space ease deployment of an ISP? >"Current thinking" of who? Sure we should conserve space, but that was >not my argument. My argument is that small ISPs are *NOT* going to >cooperate to get larger blocks. They use any tactic to make themselves >out to be 'larger fish' in that network bowl. Ever seen a nasty catfight >between small local ISPs? I have. Not pretty. Cooperation? Not likely. > This is exactly the type of mentality that the address ownership draft addresses, and without the word 'mandatory' appearing anywhere in the text. This attitude of non-cooperation is shameful. - paul