North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
does history repeat itself?
i noticed some pretty poor aggregation in some of the most recently allocated address space tonight: (advertising as's withheld to protect the innocent/guilty) 184.108.40.206/21 220.127.116.11 18.104.22.168/21 22.214.171.124 126.96.36.199 188.8.131.52/22 184.108.40.206/20 220.127.116.11/20 18.104.22.168/22 22.214.171.124/20 this seems especially bad with all the talk of better ways to allocate and advertise so that we don't waste address space. i do note that most of what i call poor aggregation appears to be due to "dual homing". are we just doomed to poor aggregation because of this? or maybe i'm just naive in thinking the internic is really cracking down on small allocations and that providers are really working hard to aggregate. -brett - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -