North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!!
I'm not a marketing droid. But only a moron would think that overall performance would NOT affect the download of a web page, which is essentially what you are attempting to say. There are certainly other ways to do it. Approximately Internet User Population raised to Internet User Population worth. Jack RIckard =================================================================== Jack Rickard Boardwatch Magazine Editor/Publisher 8500 West Bowles Ave., Ste. 210 firstname.lastname@example.org Littleton, CO 80123 www.boardwatch.com Voice: (303)973-6038 =================================================================== ---------- > From: Ben Black <email@example.com> > To: Craig A. Huegen <firstname.lastname@example.org> > Cc: Jack Rickard <email@example.com>; Peter Cole <Peter.Cole@telescan.com>; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com > Subject: Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! > Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 2:28 PM > > for an exmple of somewhat more complete and better designed benchmarks of > this type: > > http://www.inversenet.com/about/backgrounder.html#2 > > note that they understand the numerous factors that contribute to overall > performance. only a marketing droid could think downloading 50k worth of > web pages is somehow an indicator of overall performance. > > > b3n