North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: too many routes
"Kent W. England" <email@example.com> writes: > But you didn't actually do it then. Ok, true. > And the reason they started noticing it later was because > only then did you actually implement the filters, without > further notice, instead of much earlier. The surprise was > due to the fact that you did it without further notice > and not the fact that you did it. Hey, people should take notes when I rant. However you're right and as I said a long time ago it probably would have been helpful to try to coordinate things a little better. On the other hand, the unilateral action completely eliminated any argument that there was collusion between Sprint, MCI and the rest, which maybe was a good thing at the time. That people still yell about this is sort-of funny. Do you think people would be screaming less about allocation policies if I had been doing a count-down between the final warning and the actual implementation? (That's an actual question with obvious future operational impact rather than a rhetorical point. Really.) Sean.