North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
> Yup, it could, but as I noted to Paul, in the cases Sean is advocating, > the client and the NAT box may not be within the same span of > administration, either. IE: no, you may _not_ trust the NAT op. And as I noted in my reply, the real opportunities for NAT are when one side of the NAT trusts the NAT and the other side considers it "just another public client".