Re: Building a moderated nanog (was Re: hm..)

[Phil Howard]

James Rishaw busts through the QRM with...

> Something else that needs to be considered is blowing up the list (making
> smaller, distributed lists).  It takes hours sometimes for mail to go through
> the distribution.
> 
> Sometimes, I'll post, and I'll get four, five, six replies before I see my
> post to the list bounce back this way.  It takes hours. :-(  Too long for a
> list where sometimes time-critical information is discussed.

A six hour delay because the list of addressess is too large?  That would
take tens or hundreds of thousands of addressess, or else some precisely
paced queueing logic, or a pathetically overloaded machine.

I vote for Tim Ramsey setting things up on his Listserv server, if for no
other reason than to just evaluate how well it works.  Let's give it a try
for a while.

-- 
Phil Howard | eat8this@no1place.com crash340@anyplace.edu suck0it4@lame5ads.net
  phil      | eat20me6@no80ads4.com stop0843@lame4ads.edu blow6me8@anywhere.edu
    at      | ads6suck@spam9mer.edu stop4it8@no1where.edu end2ads1@no3place.com
  milepost  | blow9me5@nowhere1.com no6spam0@lame2ads.edu stop6916@spam0mer.com
    dot     | eat2this@nowhere5.org ads9suck@dumbads5.edu ads0suck@spam3mer.org
  com       | eat34me5@no3where.com stop7598@spammer6.org no4spam9@noplace2.org