RE: WCCP talk..

[Christian Kuhtz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 11:05:00PM -0500, alex@nac.net wrote:
> > That I can accept.
> > 
> > But, I still have one fundamental argument, which is to ensure
true and
> > absolute reliability, a machine should not be verifying its own
health.
> > 
> > My other concern is that now that it is licensable, will the other
cache
> > manufacturers do it properly also?

If cisco has any brains left, they will certify WCCP operation in a
series of testsuites before they let anyone claim that it is WCCP.

> Do you have a link or similar that shows that WCCP is now licensable
?

It has not been announced yet.

> Does any know of any other cache manufacturers that currently
supports
> WCCP ?

WCCP licensing is, AFAIK, not yet available.

Cheers,
Chris

- --
Christian Kuhtz <ck@adsu.bellsouth.com> -wk     ck@gnu.org -hm
Sr. Network Architect, BellSouth Corp., Advanced Data Services
NOTE: "We speak PGP: key available at well-known key servers."
            "Turnaucka's Law: The attention span of a computer 
             is only as long as its electrical cord."  
                                         -- /usr/games/fortune
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.0 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBNkoyDIRXnO1Cm58sEQIU6gCg7tl2LocA0LkLA1TVK8IUiECjY8sAniD8
drSK+t1Wzev2X7i53RyuzjVZ
=1CYs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----