North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: WCCP talk..
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 11:05:00PM -0500, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > > That I can accept. > > > > But, I still have one fundamental argument, which is to ensure true and > > absolute reliability, a machine should not be verifying its own health. > > > > My other concern is that now that it is licensable, will the other cache > > manufacturers do it properly also? If cisco has any brains left, they will certify WCCP operation in a series of testsuites before they let anyone claim that it is WCCP. > Do you have a link or similar that shows that WCCP is now licensable ? It has not been announced yet. > Does any know of any other cache manufacturers that currently supports > WCCP ? WCCP licensing is, AFAIK, not yet available. Cheers, Chris - -- Christian Kuhtz <email@example.com> -wk firstname.lastname@example.org -hm Sr. Network Architect, BellSouth Corp., Advanced Data Services NOTE: "We speak PGP: key available at well-known key servers." "Turnaucka's Law: The attention span of a computer is only as long as its electrical cord." -- /usr/games/fortune -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.0 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBNkoyDIRXnO1Cm58sEQIU6gCg7tl2LocA0LkLA1TVK8IUiECjY8sAniD8 drSK+t1Wzev2X7i53RyuzjVZ =1CYs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----