North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: OSPF multi-level hierarchy: Necessary at all?
Now I can say what I'd like to have. I'd like to have any way of inter-connection two DIFFERENT OSPF networks by such way that other network look like AREA (or STUB AREA) for the local network. This is: (the view of network admin A): -- Network-a - ABR1 -Area_1 (ABR - Area Border Router) For the admin-2 everything looks like: Area_2 -- ABR-2 - network-b Network admin 1 control Network-a with ABR-1, and define link to ABR-2 as usial link to the Area_1. Network admin 2 control network-b and define link to ABR-1 as the link to Area_2. Both Network-a and Network-b have their own backbones and the set of routers. moreover, to realise it, you need not new OSPF protocol, it can be implemented in ABR-1 and ABR-2. For now it can be modelled by running 'router ospf 1' and 'router ospf 2' on the same router, with the readvertising from one router to another, but it's configured by some tricky way and does not present network-b or network-a as an AREA (causeing some limitation and extra manual configurations). > >I don't think it's possible to control route > >import anywhere except area borders (for the OSPF case), > > sure it is not, because you need to have syncronized LSDBs for all > routers to calculate identical shortest paths. Exactly. > >> Actually, you can use NSSA, but doesn't allow for filtering either. > >Sorry, what's NSSA? Oh, sorry, I know what;s it but did not read this abbreviation before. > > Not-So-Stubby Area, it works like a stub one, but allows to have an ASBR > in it. So it does not accept ASE-LSAs from the domain, but can be used > to inject externals into it. It's just the model of ISP-customer, btw. > >> >ISP and CUST OSPF zones. > >> > >> who said you can't ? or I'm missing something? > >Yes, I can. But no one (except me) know about it -:). > > > >I mean some mixturing of OSPF and BGP properties. They are mixtured > >already - OSPF tag can hold 1 BGP paths. Through I don't think it's > >important for now. > > you mean RFC 1403? Am not sure about # RFC, but yes - I mean this old schema when OSPF keep short BGP information - this was the way first OSPF/BGP networks was built by. > > Alex. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Alex D. Zinin, Consultant > CCSI #98966 > CCIE #4015 > AMT Group / ISL > Cisco Systems Gold Certified Partner > http://www.amt.ru > irc: //EFNET/#cisco, //irc.msn.com/#NetCisco [Ustas] > > Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow (+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager) (+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)