North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: Broken 3640?
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Martin Taylor wrote: > > wouldn't this question be better served at: > > comp.dcom.sys.cisco > > it doesn't seem to fit the NANOG charter. > > marty > --- Jeff Wheat <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > > > We have an almost identical problem. I have a 3640 > > connected to a catalyst > > 2924XL. I have the switch and router both locked at > > 100/fdx. The crc error Sir "too im-PO-tant to read about switch<->router issues" 'm'arty: Somehow, I find the content in the thread you are complaining about to be MUCH more operational than bitching about the damned charter, debating the merits of gender specific mailing lists, information hot-air balloon rides, the HASL in NM, etc. In three words -- GET A LIFE. If you can't afford a life, perhaps sending an unsubscribe request would be a good alternative. Your lack of capitolization and the email address fit right in with the image you have projected. 'nuff said. --- John Fraizer