North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
I said: > >Nevertheless, the operational reality is that having a traceroute that > >shows RFC1918 addresses is more useful than a traceroute that shows > >* * *, and therefore I suspect most operators will continue to permit > >RFC1918 addresses into their networks as long as a few questionable > >individuals use them to source traffic. > > i think it's only useful to show that (a) something's there Yes, and that's sufficient justification for me. I don't particularly like traffic filters. --jhawk