North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
> OK. Poll time: This is an extremely poor way to run a poll. You should at least specify whether you want your answers in private email or a public reply to the list. Further, it'd be wise to start the subject line with POLL: or something so the people who have punted the (mostly useless) thread will pay attention. Also, it's appropriate to give time bounds for your poll. > Who lets 1918 space into and/or out of their borders? If you are and > won't admit it, I'm sure that someone will point you out. If you aren't > (and IMHO you're wise for not doing so) please chime in and show your > HIGH level of clue! You've just highly biased the selection by effectively insulting respondants in the the affirmative. Poll results are now useless, congratulations. You've now taken NANOG back to the usual sort of uselessness. Thank you. --jhawk (who values a return packet from a bogus IP address to help him debug a problem immensely, and sees filtering such data as Not Going To Help With The Social Problem Anyway, not that anyone has tried to organize or summarize this discussion in a concise fashion, hence the current free-for-all. It's difficult not to respond with ad hominem four-letter denegrations of individuals, but somehow I resist.)