Beginning March 01 2001
Messages: 1054
Page 1 of 1
First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

The North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) provides a forum for the exchange of technical information, and promotes discussion of implementation issues that require community cooperation.

There are several methods for joining the nanog list.

This archive is updated hourly. The searchable index is updated nightly.

Aaron Hopkins

• 03/16/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Aaron L. Meehan

• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/08/01 Re: NetSol Host Changes, NetSol Problems
  

Adam McKenna

• 03/16/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  

Adam Rothschild

• 03/16/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Adrian Chadd

• 03/30/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 Re: Content Injection Appliance
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  

Akio Sugeno

• 03/09/01 Re: Statistics for Public Peering Points
  

Alan Clegg

• 03/27/01 Re: verizon paging modem numbers
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 AOL holes again.
  

Alan Hannan

• 03/07/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  
• 03/06/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Next NANOG
  

Alec H. Peterson

• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Aleksi Suhonen

• 03/20/01 The Mandatory One Reply To This Weeks: T
  

alex

• 03/30/01 any non-bgp challenged engineer from Dig
  
• 03/19/01 Re: DNS is like radio frequencies
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/02/01 Re: Does peering at an ATM MAE require a
  
• 03/02/01 Re: Does peering at an ATM MAE require a
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Does peering at an ATM MAE require a
  

Alex Kamantauskas

• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Alex Rubenstein

• 03/26/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/26/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  

Alexandre.Gibouin

• 03/13/01 Prefix length filtering at the ISP-ISP e
  

Andrea Abrahamsen

• 03/08/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  
• 03/07/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  

Andrew Partan

• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  

Andy

• 03/17/01 Re: Metro area fiber market issues - May
  

Andy Ellifson

• 03/08/01 NetSol Host Changes, NetSol Problems
  

Ankur Goyal

• 03/07/01 BGP deployment
  

Anne Marcel

• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Ariel Biener

• 03/12/01 Re: Looking Glass Code
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Next NANOG (really off topic)
  

Arnd Vehling

• 03/22/01 Re: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
  
• 03/06/01 Re: Linux clusters?
  

Arnold Nipper

• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Avleen Vig

• 03/14/01 Re: DECNet over IP?
  

Barrows, Jeff

• 03/27/01 SWM ISO empirical operational data...
  

Basil Kruglov

• 03/22/01 Re: Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice
  

Ben Beuchler

• 03/19/01 Re: FTP exploit?
  

Ben Browning

• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/08/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  
• 03/07/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  
• 03/05/01 Linux clusters?
  

bera badsa

• 03/01/01 for network monkeys
  

Berger, Gary

• 03/13/01 BGP listserv
  

bert hubert

• 03/18/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/18/01 DNS is like radio frequencies
  
• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  
• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  
• 03/11/01 Re: DNS - Bind database / dns directly o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Bill Manning

• 03/28/01 late DEW - 2q2001
  

Bill Nickless

• 03/28/01 RE: MBone access
  
• 03/28/01 Re: MBone access
  

Bill Woodcock

• 03/26/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/26/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/14/01 Re: DSL backhaul provisioning
  

bmanning

• 03/21/01 Re: EP.net Issues
  
• 03/21/01 Re: EP.net Issues
  
• 03/21/01 Re: EP.net Issues
  

Bob Bownes

• 03/30/01 Geomagnetic Disturbance Was: Re: Microwa
  
• 03/29/01 Re: Microwave...
  
• 03/29/01 Re: Microwave...
  
• 03/08/01 Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet anothe
  
• 03/08/01 Namespace conflicts
  

Bora Akyol

• 03/31/01 Re: California PUC orders outage notific
  

Brad Verd

• 03/29/01 gTLD Informational Message
  
• 03/26/01 gTLD Informational Message
  
• 03/16/01 gTLD Informational Message
  
• 03/14/01 gTLD Informational Message
  

BrandonButterworth

• 03/07/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Brent Sweeny

• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  
• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  

Brett Frankenberger

• 03/22/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  

Brian

• 03/08/01 Re: BGP deployment
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: Linux clusters?
  
• 03/04/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  

Brian Russo

• 03/13/01 Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Brian Wallingford

• 03/30/01 Re: OUTAGE: network shutdown
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Bruce Campbell

• 03/21/01 Re: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
  

Bryan Bradsby

• 03/09/01 Re: PRESS RELEASE: TCH.ORG Expands Inter
  

Bryan C. Andregg

• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  

CARL.P.HIRSCH

• 03/30/01 Re: InterNAP
  
• 03/22/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  
• 03/22/01 Clear Channel on a T1
  
• 03/14/01 Re: DECNet over IP?
  
• 03/09/01 Re: UUNet/Chicago
  
• 03/01/01 [no subject]
  

Carlos Heller

• 03/10/01 Re: .mn.rr.com dns possibly hacked?
  

Carol Wadsworth

• 03/30/01 NANOG 22 -- Registration Open
  
• 03/23/01 NANOG 22 Hotel Information
  

Casassa, Nathan

• 03/03/01 @HOME AS6172 Problems
  

Charles Scott

• 03/16/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/10/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/09/01 RE: new.net
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/08/01 Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet anothe
  

Charles Smith

• 03/29/01 FW: Next Hop Attribute
  

Charles Sprickman

• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/28/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/27/01 Re: OT: verizon paging modem numbers
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Chip Rosenthal

• 03/22/01 Re: Northpoint is toast
  

Chris Beggy

• 03/12/01 tcp,guardent,bellovin
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  

Chris Davis

• 03/19/01 Multiple Roots simply need context
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/14/01 I've just tried new.net's plugin. Don't
  

Chris Gibiault

• 03/22/01 RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
  

Christian Kuhtz

• 03/22/01 RE: Clear Channel on a T1
  

Christian Nielsen

• 03/15/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Christopher A. Woodfield

• 03/23/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  
• 03/18/01 Re: Looking for Brooks Fiber contact
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Christopher Ambler

• 03/31/01 Re: Geomagnetic Disturbance Was: Re: Mic
  

Clayton Fiske

• 03/23/01 Re: Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice
  
• 03/19/01 FTP exploit?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 IP<->IP translation (was re: Statements
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  

Curtis Maurand

• 03/04/01 Re: Network Sizing Guidelines?
  
• 03/02/01 Re: Network Sizing Guidelines?
  

D'Arcy J.M. Cain

• 03/14/01 Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind
  

Dan Hollis

• 03/21/01 RE: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/05/01 Re: ibm.net mailservers gone
  

Daniel Golding

• 03/22/01 RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
  
• 03/22/01 RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
  
• 03/19/01 RE: draft-netrail-packet-over-aol-dialup
  

Daniel R Glover

• 03/06/01 Re: Network Sizing Guidelines?
  
• 03/02/01 Network Sizing Guidelines?
  

Daniel Roesen

• 03/20/01 Re: FTP exploit?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  

Daniel Senie

• 03/27/01 Re: OT: verizon paging modem numbers
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown?
  

Danny Snyder

• 03/12/01 RE: massive mail replication from 24.93.
  

Daryl G. Jurbala

• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  

David Charlap

• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/08/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  

David Hares

• 03/09/01 DNS - Bind database
  

David Klindt

• 03/14/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  

David Lesher

• 03/22/01 Re: Early warning system
  
• 03/18/01 Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl
  
• 03/13/01 Apple security contact?
  
• 03/08/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/06/01 Re: Linux clusters?
  

David McGaugh

• 03/06/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  
• 03/06/01 Loose Source Routing
  

David Meyer

• 03/01/01 Re: Next NANOG
  

David Newman

• 03/12/01 core router bakeoff at Light Reading
  

David R. Conrad

• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/12/01 Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

David R. Dick

• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

David Schwartz

• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/28/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/28/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/28/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/27/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/27/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/26/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/26/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/26/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/21/01 RE: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/18/01 RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Broken Internet? [OT]
  
• 03/09/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Dean Robb

• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Dee McKinney

• 03/27/01 RE: Microwave...
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Gee, operational content: IPv6 rout
  
• 03/15/01 RE: .xxx conflicts - new.net has competi
  
• 03/02/01 Re: Network Maps
  

deeann mikula

• 03/27/01 Re: verizon paging modem numbers
  

Deepak Jain

• 03/31/01 RE: Sprint and peering points
  
• 03/27/01 RE: Microwave...
  

Derek J. Balling

• 03/27/01 RE: verizon paging modem numbers
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  

DERY, FREDERIC

• 03/22/01 RE: Network Monitoring in a Firewall Com
  

Devon True

• 03/08/01 Statistics for Public Peering Points
  

Doane, Andrew

• 03/22/01 RE: Northpoint is toast
  
• 03/09/01 RE: UUNet/Chicago
  
• 03/07/01 RE: An example of reverse-hijack (was: n
  
• 03/07/01 An example of reverse-hijack (was: new.n
  
• 03/05/01 Resource for determining lit buildings
  

Dominic J. Eidson

• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Don Simpson

• 03/12/01 Looking Glass Code
  

doug

• 03/31/01 Re: PPPoE server software?
  

Douglas A. Dever

• 03/22/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  

dsr

• 03/09/01 Re: mail.yahoo.com, "missing A records"
  

Eddie Parra

• 03/26/01 Mbone access
  

Edward S. Marshall

• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  

Eric A. Hall

• 03/29/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/22/01 Re: Early warning system
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Eric Whitehill

• 03/10/01 RE: UUNet/Chicago
  

Gary E. Miller

• 03/22/01 Northpoint is toast
  

Geoff Huston

• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  

Glen Turner

• 03/28/01 Re: Microwave...
  

Gordon Cook

• 03/17/01 Metro area fiber market issues - May 200
  

Greg A. Woods

• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/26/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/20/01 RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/18/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/18/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/16/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/09/01 Re: mail.yahoo.com, "missing A records"
  
• 03/08/01 Re: external issues in dns scalability (
  

Greg Rumple

• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Hank Nussbacher

• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  
• 03/21/01 Re: The Mandatory One Reply To This Week
  
• 03/18/01 Looking for Brooks Fiber contact
  
• 03/15/01 .xxx conflicts - new.net has competition
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

hardie

• 03/15/01 (Seriously Off Topic) Inadvertent names
  

Havard Eidnes

• 03/30/01 Re: MBone access
  
• 03/26/01 Re: ITU / UN (was: Multiple Roots...)
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/12/01 Re: Looking Glass Code
  

Henry R. Linneweh

• 03/31/01 Re: POP energy management during power s
  
• 03/31/01 Re: California PUC orders outage notific
  
• 03/17/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/11/01 Re: Netscan.org? anyone?
  
• 03/10/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  

Henry Yen

• 03/27/01 Re: Roaring Penguin - Re: PPPoE server s
  

Howard C. Berkowitz

• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/08/01 Re: Routing Loops in IGRP
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Next NANOG (really off topic)
  

Hugh Irvine

• 03/01/01 Re: Next NANOG (really off topic)
  

Ian Cooper

• 03/09/01 RE: new.net
  

Irwin Lazar

• 03/28/01 RE: Content Injection Appliance
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Gee, operational content: IPv6 rout
  
• 03/08/01 RE: Little survey: What do people use to
  
• 03/02/01 RE: Network Sizing Guidelines?
  

Jade E. Deane

• 03/30/01 RE: California PUC blocks Northpoint shu
  
• 03/30/01 out/in band management networks (incredi
  

James DeMong

• 03/06/01 GSR and bgp maximum-paths
  

James M. Kretchmar

• 03/08/01 Re: Little survey: What do people use to
  

James M. Shuler III

• 03/22/01 Re: Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice
  
• 03/22/01 Re: Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots simply need context
  

Jared Mauch

• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  
• 03/27/01 Re: Mbone access
  
• 03/26/01 Re: Mbone access
  
• 03/06/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  

Jason A. Mills

• 03/22/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  

Jason Lixfeld

• 03/26/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/25/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/18/01 Anyone at the @Home NOC?
  
• 03/09/01 RE: UUNet/Chicago
  

Jason Slagle

• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  

Jeff Workman

• 03/18/01 Re: draft-netrail-packet-over-aol-dialup
  
• 03/17/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/15/01 Re: .xxx conflicts - new.net has competi
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  

Jeffrey Haas

• 03/22/01 Re: Early warning system
  

Jerry Scharf

• 03/31/01 OT financial analysis of telecom sector
  
• 03/15/01 Re: FW: DECNet over IP?
  

Jim Dixon

• 03/19/01 Re: DNS threads
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/15/01 Re: DNS Control
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Reality Check
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Reality Check
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Reality Check
  
• 03/09/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net
  

Jim Duncan

• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  

Jim Mercer

• 03/19/01 teleglobe, toronto router or link broken
  
• 03/19/01 Re: RACO looking for you
  
• 03/18/01 RACO looking for you
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/09/01 mail.yahoo.com, "missing A records" and
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

jlewis

• 03/26/01 Re: Sprint hosed...routing breakdown in
  
• 03/26/01 Sprint hosed...routing breakdown in Chic
  
• 03/20/01 RE: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/02/01 PSI free peering
  

Joe Abley

• 03/24/01 BGP Community Attribute Support
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/09/01 arrgh
  

Joe Marr

• 03/15/01 RE: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown?
  

Joe McGuckin

• 03/30/01 Re: OUTAGE: network shutdown
  

Joe Provo

• 03/22/01 Re: EP.net Issues
  
• 03/16/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Joe Shaw

• 03/01/01 Re: Summary: Seattle earthquake - no imp
  

Joe Wood

• 03/21/01 Re: EP.net Issues
  
• 03/21/01 EP.net Issues
  

Joel Jaeggli

• 03/02/01 RE: Zero-wing references [OFF-TOPIC]
  

John

• 03/29/01 Re: Alteon Question
  
• 03/19/01 test
  
• 03/19/01 BGPv5
  

John A. Tamplin

• 03/22/01 Re: Early warning system
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

John Fraizer

• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/28/01 Re: Experience with Larscom NetEdge 85M'
  
• 03/28/01 RE: Microwave...
  
• 03/27/01 RE: Microwave...
  
• 03/27/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/26/01 Re: Sprint hosed...routing breakdown in
  
• 03/23/01 Re: RADB lookup help
  
• 03/23/01 RADB lookup help
  
• 03/21/01 Re: EP.net Issues
  
• 03/21/01 Re: EP.net Issues
  
• 03/21/01 Re: EP.net Issues
  
• 03/19/01 RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  

John Hawkinson

• 03/07/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  
• 03/07/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  

john heasley

• 03/12/01 Re: Looking Glass Code
  

John Murphy

• 03/08/01 Re: Little survey: What do people use to
  

John Palmer (NANOG Acct)

• 03/28/01 Re: Looking for a good dual homing situa
  
• 03/25/01 Looking for a good dual homing situation
  

John Payne

• 03/30/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/30/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/27/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/10/01 Re: .mn.rr.com dns possibly hacked?
  
• 03/09/01 Re: mail.yahoo.com, "missing A records"
  

John R Levine

• 03/31/01 Lame reverse delegation at Sprint
  

John R. Levine

• 03/05/01 Re: ibm.net mailservers gone
  

John Todd

• 03/12/01 Re: Looking Glass Code
  

Jon Allen Boone

• 03/29/01 Re: GSR and bgp maximum-paths
  

Jon Mansey

• 03/06/01 Re: Linux clusters?
  

Jon Stanley

• 03/28/01 Experience with Larscom NetEdge 85M's
  

Jonathan Disher

• 03/25/01 Provider outage explanations...
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Joseph T. Klein

• 03/06/01 Tower of Babbel
  

Josh Richards

• 03/31/01 Re: Sprint and peering points
  
• 03/31/01 Re: Sprint and peering points
  
• 03/28/01 Re: Content Injection Appliance
  
• 03/28/01 Re: RADIUS info for traveling users ...
  
• 03/28/01 Re: Microwave...
  
• 03/22/01 Re: Early warning system
  
• 03/10/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  

Joshua Goodall

• 03/08/01 Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dn
  

just me.

• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Broken Internet?
  

Justin A. Kraft

• 03/28/01 Looking for a T-1 loop in Antigua
  

k claffy

• 03/02/01 Re: Network Maps
  

K.Graham

• 03/30/01 Summary of Alteon inquiry
  
• 03/29/01 RE: Alteon Responses
  
• 03/29/01 Alteon Question
  

Karl

• 03/27/01 Roaring Penguin - Re: PPPoE server softw
  

Karyn Ulriksen

• 03/26/01 Contact for Firstworld Communications
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Search Engine Accountability (was RE
  
• 03/16/01 Search Engine Accountability (was RE: Re
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Broken Internet? [OT]
  
• 03/08/01 The .SUCKS TLD saga continues
  
• 03/08/01 more .sucks TLD fun
  
• 03/08/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/02/01 Network Maps
  

Kavi, Prabhu

• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/06/01 Snowstorm effects on Network Utilization
  

Ken Eddings

• 03/08/01 RE: new.net
  

ken harris.

• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/19/01 Re: FTP exploit?
  
• 03/17/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  

Kenji Anzai

• 03/21/01 RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
  
• 03/21/01 using ARIN assigned address in Asia
  

Kent Yu

• 03/19/01 Is www.cisco.com down?
  

Kevin Day

• 03/10/01 .mn.rr.com dns possibly hacked?
  

Kevin Facinelli

• 03/23/01 Re: Advice on colo locations in SJC
  
• 03/07/01 Call for Whitepapers / Research
  

Kevin Loch

• 03/30/01 Re: Geomagnetic Disturbance Was: Re: Mic
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/14/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Kevin Oberman

• 03/28/01 Re: Microwave...
  
• 03/23/01 Re: Advanced Warning: Qwest/Lucent ATM u
  
• 03/22/01 Re: Early warning system
  
• 03/15/01 Re: FW: DECNet over IP?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: FW: DECNet over IP?
  
• 03/07/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Does peering at an ATM MAE require a
  

Krzysztof Adamski

• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Larry Rosenman

• 03/30/01 InterNAP
  

Lee Watterworth

• 03/09/01 RE: UUNet/Chicago
  

Lionel Lauer

• 03/22/01 Re: Early warning system
  

Lloyd Taylor

• 03/22/01 Re: Early warning system
  

lucifer

• 03/23/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

M. David Leonard

• 03/20/01 RE: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  

Majdi S. Abbas

• 03/30/01 Re: California PUC blocks Northpoint shu
  
• 03/22/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  

Manish Patil

• 03/07/01 Routing Loops in IGRP
  

Marc Teichtahl

• 03/29/01 Re: RADIUS info for traveling users ...
  

marcellus

• 03/01/01 MAE West ATM
  

Mark Borchers

• 03/09/01 RE: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/06/01 RE: Loose Source Routing
  

Mark Kosters

• 03/28/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  

Mark Prior

• 03/11/01 Re: [apops] The Cidr Report
  

Mark Radabaugh - Amplex

• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  

Marshall Eubanks

• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  
• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  
• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  
• 03/27/01 Re: Mbone access
  
• 03/27/01 Re: Mbone access
  
• 03/19/01 Re: ARIN overloaded...
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/05/01 Re: Network Sizing Guidelines?
  

Martin Hannigan

• 03/08/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Martin Picard

• 03/20/01 Secure multi-homing Internet Access
  

Martin, Christian

• 03/27/01 RE: MBone access
  

Mathew Butler

• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Broken Internet? [OT]
  
• 03/08/01 RE: new.net
  
• 03/07/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/04/01 RE: Network Sizing Guidelines? [OT]
  
• 03/02/01 RE: Covad SUCKS!
  
• 03/02/01 RE: Zero-wing references [OFF-TOPIC]
  

Mathias Koerber

• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  

Matt Clauson

• 03/22/01 Fwd: [Interchange-announce] Security adv
  

Matt Cramer

• 03/26/01 PPPoE server software?
  

Matt Levine

• 03/30/01 Input..
  
• 03/21/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/19/01 ARIN overloaded...
  
• 03/06/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Matthew Schlegel

• 03/01/01 RE:
  

mdevney

• 03/23/01 Re: Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/16/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/10/01 Re: NetSol Host Changes, NetSol Problems
  
• 03/10/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/02/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  

michael

• 03/27/01 att network people here
  
• 03/25/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/25/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/25/01 dsl providers that will route /24
  

Michael Shields

• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  

michael thomas guldan

• 03/09/01 looking for midwest sprint rep
  

Michelle T

• 03/17/01 RE: .mn.rr.com dns possibly hacked?
  
• 03/17/01 RE: .mn.rr.com dns possibly hacked?
  
• 03/09/01 RE: UUNet/Chicago
  

Miguel Mata-Cardona

• 03/09/01 network availability standards
  

Mike Batchelor

• 03/30/01 California PUC blocks Northpoint shutdow
  
• 03/27/01 RE: verizon paging modem numbers
  
• 03/19/01 RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/09/01 RE: new.net
  
• 03/09/01 RE: new.net
  
• 03/09/01 RE: new.net
  
• 03/09/01 RE: DNS - Bind database
  
• 03/08/01 RE: NetSol Host Changes, NetSol Problems
  
• 03/07/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/07/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

mike harrison

• 03/15/01 Re: DNS Control
  
• 03/15/01 DNS Control
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind
  
• 03/10/01 Re: DNS - Bind database
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Miles Fidelman

• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/18/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/18/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/02/01 Re: Network Sizing Guidelines?
  

Mohan Sundar

• 03/28/01 Re: RADIUS info for traveling users ...
  
• 03/28/01 RADIUS info for traveling users ...
  

Morris Allen

• 03/13/01 News Feed
  

msarges

• 03/08/01 Re: Sprint Problem
  

Muljawan Hendrianto

• 03/06/01 Re: Linux clusters?
  

Nanog

• 03/26/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  

Neil J. McRae

• 03/21/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  

nicholas harteau

• 03/09/01 Re: UUNet/Chicago
  
• 03/09/01 Re: UUNet/Chicago
  
• 03/09/01 UUNet/Chicago
  

Nick Guy

• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  

Omachonu Ogali

• 03/18/01 draft-netrail-packet-over-aol-dialup-00.
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  

Owen DeLong

• 03/16/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Reality Check
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  

Patrick Corliss

• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/19/01 Re: DNS threads
  
• 03/19/01 Re: DNS threads
  
• 03/19/01 Re: DNS is like radio frequencies
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/18/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/18/01 Multiple Roots are "a good thing" - Karl
  
• 03/17/01 Re: Top Level Domain Finder Tools
  

Patrick Greenwell

• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Reality Check
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/09/01 Re: DNS - Bind database
  
• 03/09/01 Re: DNS - Bind database
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/08/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Patrik Greenspawn

• 03/15/01 Thanks Merit!
  

Paul A Vixie

• 03/24/01 rtty 4.0
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 new.net: yet another dns namespace overl
  

Paul Froutan

• 03/06/01 Re: GSR and bgp maximum-paths
  

Paul Lantinga

• 03/27/01 RE: Microwave...
  

Paul Mabey

• 03/05/01 Re: ibm.net mailservers gone
  

Paul Thornton

• 03/09/01 Re: Statistics for Public Peering Points
  

Paul Vixie

• 03/08/01 external issues in dns scalability (1995
  

Peter Francis

• 03/14/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  

Peter Galbavy

• 03/26/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind
  

Peter van Dijk

• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  

Petri Stephen

• 03/19/01 Test
  

Pim van Riezen

• 03/14/01 Re: [NANOG] I've just tried new.net's pl
  
• 03/08/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/07/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  

Rachel Warren

• 03/23/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  

Rafi Sadowsky

• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Looking Glass Code
  
• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  
• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  

Randy Bush

• 03/22/01 RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/11/01 massive mail replication from 24.93.35.2
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  

Rich Fulton

• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/13/01 Re: BGP listserv
  

Rich Sena

• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Richard A. Steenbergen

• 03/20/01 Re: Is www.cisco.com down?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Richard Jimmerson

• 03/21/01 RE: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
  

Richard Welty

• 03/20/01 RE: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/06/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

richb

• 03/08/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Rick Irving

• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots simply need context
  

Rob Evans

• 03/30/01 Re: GSR and bgp maximum-paths
  
• 03/07/01 Re: GSR and bgp maximum-paths
  

Rob Thomas

• 03/13/01 Re: BGP listserv
  

Robert Beverly

• 03/15/01 Cisco Misrepresents Results of First Ind
  

Rodney Joffe

• 03/27/01 Microwave...
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Roeland Meyer

• 03/31/01 RE: California PUC orders outage notific
  
• 03/28/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/25/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/21/01 RE: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/21/01 RE: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 RE: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/19/01 RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/19/01 RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/18/01 RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/18/01 RE: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/17/01 RE: Top Level Domain Finder Tools
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Reality Check
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Inane ... even for NANOG.
  
• 03/15/01 Recall: Inane ... even for NANOG.
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Inane ... even for NANOG.
  
• 03/15/01 Inane ... even for NANOG.
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Forgery! ...
  
• 03/14/01 RE: new.net
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Broken Internet?
  
• 03/13/01 RE: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind
  
• 03/10/01 RE: more .sucks TLD fun
  
• 03/10/01 RE: external issues in dns scalability (
  
• 03/10/01 RE: Namespace conflicts
  

Roland Dobbins

• 03/25/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/17/01 Re: Top Level Domain Finder Tools
  

Ron Buchalski

• 03/23/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  
• 03/23/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  
• 03/22/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  

Ron Snyder

• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  

Roy

• 03/31/01 Sprint and peering points
  
• 03/05/01 ibm.net mailservers gone
  

Roy Hockett

• 03/27/01 OT: verizon paging modem numbers
  

Rusty H. Hodge

• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Sabri Berisha

• 03/02/01 Re: home.nl NOC contact number.
  

Saint skullY the Dazed

• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  

Sam Habash

• 03/01/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  

Sam Thomas

• 03/15/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  

Scott Francis

• 03/30/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/27/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/22/01 Re: using ARIN assigned address in Asia
  
• 03/19/01 Re: FTP exploit?
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Search Engine Accountability (was RE
  
• 03/15/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Reality Check
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Reality Check
  
• 03/15/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Reality Check
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  
• 03/02/01 Re: Network Sizing Guidelines?
  
• 03/02/01 Re: Network Sizing Guidelines?
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Next NANOG (really off topic)
  

Scott Gifford

• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/09/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/09/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/09/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/08/01 Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet anothe
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Sean Donelan

• 03/31/01 POP energy management during power short
  
• 03/30/01 California PUC orders outage notificatio
  
• 03/30/01 OUTAGE: network shutdown
  
• 03/27/01 Re: SWM ISO empirical operational data..
  
• 03/23/01 Re: Advanced Warning: Qwest/Lucent ATM u
  
• 03/23/01 Advanced Warning: Qwest/Lucent ATM upgra
  
• 03/22/01 Re: Early warning system
  
• 03/22/01 Early warning system
  
• 03/19/01 California rolling blackouts - March edi
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/08/01 Re: Sprint Problem
  
• 03/08/01 Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet anothe
  
• 03/08/01 Performance at the limits
  
• 03/01/01 One ISP is working to solve problems in
  
• 03/01/01 Summary: Seattle earthquake - no impact
  

Segal, Mark

• 03/25/01 RE: xDSL providers that will route /24
  
• 03/18/01 RE: RACO looking for you
  

Sehmel, William C.

• 03/11/01 Netscan.org? anyone?
  
• 03/05/01 Mcleod.net anyone?
  

shane

• 03/28/01 Content Injection Appliance
  

Shawn McMahon

• 03/22/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/21/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/21/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Reality Check
  
• 03/15/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: DSL backhaul provisioning
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/09/01 Re: mail.yahoo.com, "missing A records"
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/09/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/08/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/08/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/08/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Simon Higgs

• 03/19/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/17/01 Re: Top Level Domain Finder Tools
  
• 03/17/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/17/01 Top Level Domain Finder Tools
  
• 03/17/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/16/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/16/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/14/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/14/01 Single DNS Root (was Re: Statements agai
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/08/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  

Simon Leinen

• 03/03/01 Re: The Cidr Report
  

Simon Lockhart

• 03/23/01 Advice on colo locations in SJC
  
• 03/14/01 Re: DECNet over IP?
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Next NANOG
  

Simon Lyall

• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: News Feed
  

smd

• 03/16/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/06/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  
• 03/06/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  

Smith, Rick

• 03/13/01 RE: Filtering email messages for canned
  
• 03/13/01 Filtering email messages for canned ham
  

Spencer.Wood

• 03/19/01 Re: FTP exploit?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: DECNet over IP?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: DECNet over IP?
  

Stephen Griffin

• 03/10/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  

Stephen J. Wilcox

• 03/19/01 Re: Top Level Domain Finder Tools
  
• 03/17/01 Re: Top Level Domain Finder Tools
  
• 03/17/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/17/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/09/01 Re: PRESS RELEASE: TCH.ORG Expands Inter
  

Stephen Kowalchuk

• 03/29/01 anyone having trouble reaching ICANN sit
  
• 03/14/01 Re: new.net
  

Stephen Sprunk

• 03/15/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  

Stephen Stuart

• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  

Steve Feldman

• 03/01/01 Re: Does peering at an ATM MAE require a
  

Steve Gibbard

• 03/26/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  

Steve Goldstein

• 03/01/01 Fwd: New York's Con Ed sends power to a
  

Steve Meuse

• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  

Steve Noble

• 03/30/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/29/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/07/01 Re: An example of reverse-hijack (was: n
  

Steve Riley (MCS)

• 03/06/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Steve Rubin

• 03/08/01 PRESS RELEASE: TCH.ORG Expands Internet
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Steve Sobol

• 03/26/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/26/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/21/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/18/01 Re: Looking for Brooks Fiber contact
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Sad state of affairs
  
• 03/12/01 Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind)
  
• 03/08/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  
• 03/07/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  
• 03/01/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  

Steven J. Sobol

• 03/12/01 Re: Would anyone be interested (SQL/Bind
  
• 03/07/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Steven M. Bellovin

• 03/23/01 Re: rumors about rolling blackouts in Ea
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/18/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  
• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  
• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Stillman, Kevin

• 03/14/01 RE: DECNet over IP?
  
• 03/14/01 DECNet over IP?
  

Subhendu Ghosh

• 03/23/01 rumors about rolling blackouts in East?
  

Susan Harris

• 03/19/01 NANOG 22!
  
• 03/18/01 DNS threads
  

tek weeny

• 03/01/01 Does peering at an ATM MAE require a rou
  

Terrence Chatfield

• 03/22/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  
• 03/22/01 Re: Clear Channel on a T1
  

Thomas Kernen

• 03/08/01 Telia's looking glass
  

Tim Lund

• 03/21/01 Network Monitoring in a Firewall Complex
  

Tim Winders

• 03/28/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/28/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/28/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  
• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  

Timothy Brown

• 03/15/01 Gee, operational content: IPv6 routing
  

Timothy J. Salo

• 03/16/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  

Timothy R. McKee

• 03/19/01 RE: Multiple Roots simply need context
  
• 03/16/01 Sad state of affairs
  
• 03/15/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/14/01 RE: I've just tried new.net's plugin. D
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Reality Check
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Reality Check
  
• 03/14/01 FW: FW: DECNet over IP?
  
• 03/14/01 Reality Check
  
• 03/14/01 FW: DECNet over IP?
  
• 03/13/01 The Meat of The Matter
  

Toerless Eckert

• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  

Tom Lettington

• 03/09/01 Re: Namespace conflicts
  

Tony Bates

• 03/31/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 03/24/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 03/17/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 03/10/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 03/03/01 The Cidr Report
  

Tony Hain

• 03/08/01 RE: Namespace conflicts
  

Travis Pugh

• 03/23/01 Re: Advanced Warning: Qwest/Lucent ATM u
  
• 03/13/01 RE: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown?
  
• 03/13/01 UUNet / ATT peering meltdown?
  

troy

• 03/30/01 RE: dsl providers that will route /24
  

Troy Davis

• 03/19/01 Re: Netscan.org? anyone?
  

Ukyo Kuonji

• 03/12/01 RE: Looking Glass Code
  
• 03/08/01 RE: Sprint Problem
  
• 03/08/01 Sprint Problem
  

Ulf Zimmermann

• 03/28/01 OT: kinda off topic at least: Looking fo
  

Vadim Antonov

• 03/27/01 Re: MBone access
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/15/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 RE: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/08/01 Re: external issues in dns scalability (
  
• 03/08/01 Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet anothe
  
• 03/07/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  
• 03/07/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns
  
• 03/06/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  

Valdis.Kletnieks

• 03/29/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/27/01 Re: dsl providers that will route /24
  
• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  
• 03/18/01 Re: Multiple Roots are "a good thing" -
  
• 03/17/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/16/01 Re: Search Engine Accountability (was RE
  
• 03/15/01 Re: I've just tried new.net's plugin. Do
  
• 03/15/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/14/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Statements against new.net?
  
• 03/12/01 Re: tcp,guardent,bellovin
  
• 03/12/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/12/01 Re: new.net
  
• 03/07/01 Re: Loose Source Routing
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/04/01 Re: Network Sizing Guidelines?
  

Vivien M.

• 03/16/01 RE: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/06/01 RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

Walters

• 03/07/01 RE: Loose Source Routing
  

Wayne

• 03/20/01 Re: AOL holes again.
  

William Allen Simpson

• 03/13/01 DSL backhaul provisioning
  
• 03/13/01 Re: Broken Internet?
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/08/01 Re: external issues in dns scalability (
  
• 03/08/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/07/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  
• 03/06/01 Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace o
  

William F. Maton

• 03/16/01 RE: Gee, operational content: IPv6 rout
  
• 03/09/01 Re: Fiber cut in Ontario, Canada cutsoff
  
• 03/09/01 Fiber cut in Ontario, Canada cutsoff @ho
  

William R. Charnock

• 03/19/01 PAIX-Central (Dallas)
  

Yu Ning

• 03/22/01 Real world Anti-DDOS attack practice.
  

Zane McCarthy

• 03/12/01 RE: massive mail replication from 24.93.
  

First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

Previous month