North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown?
That may be a little extreme ... I generally get good support from all of my upstreams. However, there's a certain amount of static to be expected when you start raising inter-provider issues, especially when all the latency seems be caused by the provider you aren't a customer of. -travis On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Tom Thomas wrote: > Bad attitudes to a customer are a clear indication you should take your > money elsewhere. > > Personally I like NetRail, they are courteous and responsive. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of > Travis Pugh > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 1:13 PM > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown? > > > > > Not to open up any potential disputes, but has anyone heard what is going > on between UUNet and AT&T on the east coast? We've been seeing this kind > of performance for a week ... standard UUNet NOC response was "it's ATT's > problem, call them" which doesn't do me a whole lot of good since we're > not an ATT customer. > > UUNet --> ATT > > 6 POS6-0.BR3.NYC9.ALTER.NET (126.96.36.199) 9.212 ms 9.633 ms 10.363 > ms > 7 188.8.131.52 (184.108.40.206) 9.642 ms 12.967 ms 12.137 ms > 8 gbr3-p50.n54ny.ip.att.net (220.127.116.11) 418.555 ms 416.419 ms > 419.819 ms > > ATT --> UUNet > > 8 ggr1-p370.attga.ip.att.net (18.104.22.168) [AS 7018] 20 msec 24 msec > 20 msec > 9 att-gw.atl.uu.net (22.214.171.124) [AS 7018] 396 msec 396 msec 392 > msec > 10 179.at-6-0-0.XR1.ATL5.ALTER.NET (126.96.36.199) [AS 701] 388 msec 388 > msec 388 msec > > Thanks. > > -travis > > > >