North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: A question on CE to PE route exchanges ...
On 5/21/2001 at 14:18:15 -0700, Robert Raszuk said: > > > not be interested. The issue here is that Cisco will tend to > > add IGP routes to the default table, not the VPN table. Bad > > things ensue. > > What ... ? For protocols that have been vrf aware routes go into vrfs > and not global RIB. That's the problem: not all the IGP's (specifically, not ours) are aware, and handling for a non-aware IGP on a VRF interface is more dangerous than one might expect. -Dave