North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecdotes)
Following up on my own post: firstname.lastname@example.org (Paul Vixie) writes: > Recommendation: upgrade your peering requirements to include language like: > ... Several folks here talked about technical implementation aspects (RPF, etc) and a few told me privately that peering was a sales/marketing activity at this stage of the game. This either means that upgrading the general level of peering agreement is not possible, or that the people I should be discussing it with don't read NANOG. This echos what I learnt at Stephen's BOF in Phoenix.