North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecdotes)
But please don't forget that in this particular DDoS event there was no IP spoofing. So anti-spoofing precautions, either on administrative or technical level, would be useless in this case. And this case is not so untypical. my .002$ Przemek -----Original Message----- From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Paul Vixie Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:44 PM To: email@example.com Subject: Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecdotes) Following up on my own post: firstname.lastname@example.org (Paul Vixie) writes: > Recommendation: upgrade your peering requirements to include language like: > ... Several folks here talked about technical implementation aspects (RPF, etc) and a few told me privately that peering was a sales/marketing activity at this stage of the game. This either means that upgrading the general level of peering agreement is not possible, or that the people I should be discussing it with don't read NANOG. This echos what I learnt at Stephen's BOF in Phoenix.