North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: multi-homing fixes
|> From: Randy Bush [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] |> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:51 PM |> |> the point of 2xDS3 was specifically to get major services, |> and not to get |> every basement dual-homer. do the latter and you have the |> same grazing |> of the commons as we have today. Considering the cost of a DS1, in California anyways, I might disagree with you. DS1 is steep enough, DS3's are much too steep and sounds much too anti-competitive. Randy, you also know the rates the rest of the planet pays for E1's and E2's, if they can even get anything that fast. If you want a speed-bump then don't build a speed-farging-mountain. What you are saying is that businesses that can't afford the monthlies of a pair of DS3's aren't allowed to be in business? Is that an official position? How would you like it if you were in that position? Can I quote you on that?