Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering

[Joseph T. Klein]

It is a free market and they can do anything they want.

If you have 5000 routes, and OC48c backbone and 3 OC3s worth of traffic at
a 2:1 ratio; peering with C&W is a snap.

It clearly improved the ability of new players to enter the market for the
FCC to aprove the transfer of MCI Internet assests to C&W. It clearly
resulted in the market conditions the federal goverment desired.

--On Tuesday, 26 March 2002 12:35 -0500 German Martinez <gmartine@mafalda.opentransit.net> wrote:

> Chris,
> You are right.
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Chris Woodfield wrote:
>
> > I'm presuming that Exodus is planning to get the transit they need after this
> > depeering via C&W's peering points? If so, this makes a certain amount of sense - no
> Looking at Exodus Route Server you will see that they are now getting
> transit from C&W.  Probably using as you state their current peering
> circuits (it makes sense from an operational point of view, when you are
> consolidating an AS into a single one).
>
> route-server.exodus.net>sh ip bgp regexp _3561_
> BGP table version is 15604957, local router ID is 209.1.220.234
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> internal
> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
>    Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> * i3.0.0.0          209.1.40.148                 1000      0 3561 1239 80
> i
> * i                 209.1.220.242                1000      0 3561 1239 80
> i
> * i                 209.1.220.102                1000      0 3561 1239 80
> i
> * i                 209.1.220.9                  1000      0 3561 1239 80
> i
> * i3.18.135.0/24    209.1.220.102                1000      0 3561 7018 ?
> * i                 209.1.220.9                  1000      0 3561 7018 ?
> * i4.0.0.0          209.1.40.148                 1000      0 3561 1 i
> * i                 209.1.220.174                1000      0 3561 1 i
> * i                 209.1.220.102                1000      0 3561 1 i
> * i                 209.1.220.242                1000      0 3561 1 i
> * i                 209.1.220.133                1000      0 3561 1 i
> * i                 209.1.40.72                  1000      0 3561 1 i
> * i                 209.1.40.141                 1000      0 3561 1 i
> * i                 209.1.220.9                  1000      0 3561 1 i
> * i                 209.1.220.102                1000      0 3561 1 i
> * i                 209.1.220.9                  1000      0 3561 1 i
> * i6.0.0.0/20       209.1.40.148                 1000      0 3561 3549 i
> * i                 209.1.220.156                1000      0 3561 3549 i
> * i                 209.1.220.242                1000      0 3561 3549 i
> * i                 209.1.40.72                  1000      0 3561 3549 i
> * i                 209.1.40.141                 1000      0 3561 3549 i
> * i                 209.1.220.174                1000      0 3561 3549 i
> * i9.2.0.0/16       209.1.40.148                 1000      0 3561 701 i
> * i                 209.1.220.174                1000      0 3561 701 i
>
>
> > need to maintain separate peering circuits; this is probably just a step in the
> > eventual assimilation of Exodus' IP backbone into C&W's.
> >
> > -C
> What I don't know is what they are going to do with their private peers ?
> Does somebody has a clue on this ?
>
> >

--
Joseph T. Klein