North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering
> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:20:02 +0000 (GMT) > From: Stephen J. Wilcox <firstname.lastname@example.org> > On another angle, if enough people refuse to take C&W routes > from transit preferring only peering.... nar, thats a > conspiracy! Good plan tho. But if provider X becomes undesirable, I'd expect people to adjust local-pref on learned routes. That reduces the amount of traffic _to_ the provider in question, which certainly affects symmetry. If you _really_ want to get nasty, think frac-DS1, ^AS$ on inbound, and ^$ on outbound. :-P Oh, wait... except for the filter lists being a tish off, that's how peering between certain providers used to be in the mid, even late, 1990s. ;-) [Stretching the truth, but certain inter-AS hops sure made me wonder...] Eddy Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence -- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <email@example.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.