North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Vulnerbilities of Interconnection
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:55:40PM -0400, batz wrote: > On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Pawlukiewicz Jane wrote: > :would be difficult to reach. I'd have to run a model to be sure, but > :every one of the major seven have rerouting methodologies that would > :recover from the loss. And I don't think they exclusively peer at > > ASN's to "fail", then see who is still connected, but we are > still dealing with connectivity relatve to us and our peers, > even 5+ AS-hops away. > > I would imagine this is one of the tasks CAIDA.org is probably > working on, as it seems to fall within their mission. Coming up with the as interconnection data is actaully fairly easy if you parse route-views data. This obviously doesn't cover every possible interconnection that exists but it does provide a large swath of data to review for the interconnection postulation. Looking at that data, (this is an old snapshot) the top ten networks are: (in #10->#1 order) conn ASN ----+---- 161 3356 229 1 242 2914 248 209 274 6461 277 3561 295 3549 328 7018 484 701 493 1239 - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from firstname.lastname@example.org clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.