North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: IP address fee??
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:04:08PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: [snip] > About classfulness: I think it's more relevant, even today, than many > people like to admit. Why is it that I can type "network 192.0.2.0" in my > Cisco BGP config and the box knows what I'm talking about, but "network > 192.0.2.0/24" is no good? That is because Cisco is quite classful-centric, still. I think defaults for netmasks, based on classes, are very bad. They cause trouble (like the time a certain ISP announced 62/8 to all it's peers on AMS-IX). Cisco should support the /n notation! Greetz, Peter -- firstname.lastname@example.org | http://www.dataloss.nl/ | Undernet:#clue