North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Provider feedback Aleron=BAD!
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:56:22PM -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote: > > If they were singly homed to Aleron, technically, they don't qualify. > Alex, Even if they weren't multihomed, they have every right to go to ARIN to request address space (provided they could justify >= a /20 allocation). Being multihomed only helps build the case, but is not a requirement. It's all on their website: http://www.arin.net/policy/ipv4.html#requirements charles > > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote: > > > > > TT> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:10:01 -0600 > > TT> From: Tech Team1 > > > > > > TT> Since we had about 16 /24s (well utilized) this was going to > > > > And you didn't approach ARIN for PI space? > > > > > > Eddy > > -- > > Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division > > Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building > > Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national > > Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) > > From: A Trap <email@example.com> > > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > > Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. > > > > These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. > > Do NOT send mail to <email@example.com>, or you are likely to > > be blocked. > > > > -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, firstname.lastname@example.org, latency, Al Reuben -- > -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net -- > >