North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: 220.127.116.11/8 - Please update your filters
SS> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:46:53 -0600 SS> From: Stephen Sprunk (Props to whoever thought up what you put in the "To" field) SS> From an academic standpoint, that would be a very interesting SS> experiment. However, most of us are paid to keep our SS> networks or services running, not to intentionally break SS> them. I see. So you advocate innocent 69/8 users suffering because you don't want to cause pain for the lazy and inept? I'd rather see the latter paying for their sins, not innocent third parties. Note that my suggestions (credit to Jeff Wheeler for suggesting roots in new IP allocations) would break NOTHING on a properly- maintained network. Let's put it this way: 69/8 evidently is still being filtered by some, despite pleading and time. Things _will_ break. This won't be the last time we encounter new allocations, either. _Someone_ will feel pain. Who do you feel should bear the brunt? How do you propose to make it happen? Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <email@example.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.