North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies.
> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 14:59:05 -0500 (EST) > From: jlewis > In AOL's case, they couldn't even tell us why our mail was > being rejected or our connections to their MX's blocked and I > had to wait a week for their postmaster dept. to get to my > ticket and return my call to fill me in on what was going on. Ewwww. Much better to put a semi-descriptive code in the 5.x.x and give a contact phone number and/or off-net email box. > Parts of the community have already decided and have helped to > create central quasi-authoratative DNSBLs. If nobody uses a > DNSBL, who care's what's in it? If a sufficient number of True. It cracks me up when someone complains about being on Selwerd XBL. Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <email@example.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.