North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Issue with 184.108.40.206/8 - 220.127.116.11/24?
DJR> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:01:51 +0700 DJR> From: Dr. Jeffrey Race DJR> [C:\]ping 18.104.22.168 DJR> [C:\]host 22.214.171.124 1. You read the NANOG FAQ, yes? Please explain your post. 2. Did TCP attempts to various well-known ports stay in SYN_SENT, switch to CONNECTED, or return a RST? Or did you not try? Thanks for proving that experience in one sphere doesn't bring any free credibility in another. You posted what you should not, and gave the wrong answer at that. If you want to go around bragging "i'm mad l33t, yo" without skills to back it up, I suggest IRC as a better medium. Remember: The majority of the posters here probably have roughly as much (but not as much) of an ego as you, yet a _lot_ more experience and skills to back it up. I think the results are obvious. Consider being an early adopter of IPv8. Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <email@example.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.