North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Re: The in-your-face hijacking example, was: Re: Who is announcing bogons?
> Hello, > > It's pretty disheartening to see the way this situation was dealt with. = > To this day as I am writing this e-mail I have not received any phone = > calls or even e-mails on what was done wrong and how it should be = > handled. Everything was done behind our backs by the people that have = > the power to cause problems knowing that I will have no recourse. It = > takes a few seconds to place a phone call and give guidance on the = > situation. Especially by the likes of HE which we have given business = > to and continue to give business to. =20 > > Well I guess that there is no point in going on with this topic. = > Officially I am declaring surrender and victory to the people that have = > chosen to cause so much harm. Would like to thank all of you that have = > given support and e-mailed me with how to obtain correct allocation from = > ARIN. And the wheels are already in motion and will be completed next = > week. > > Hopefully Atrivo and myself are not blacklisted in this group, since we = > caused nobody any harm. We did follow all the guidelines that Arin has = > put in place, but now it's my understanding that due to our size only a = > direct allocation makes any sense. > > Thanks and let's all try to help each other and not go against each = > other. It will make our lives just that much easier! =20 > > Atrivo - Web Innovation > Emil Kacperski > Phone: 925-550-3947 > E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org > ICQ: 23531098 I had heard that Atrivo had squatted some space from Ready Systems (18.104.22.168/16) that was an abandoned wasteland. I had also heard that this was brought to the attention of everyone who was squatting that space. Now, my information may be wrong, however I consider the source to be quite reliable. If my information _is_ reliable, things weren't done behind anyone's back, and this wouldn't be the first instance of questionable behaviour.