North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
SS> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:22:38 -0500 SS> From: Stephen Sprunk SS> When a 30Mpps IPv4 box falls back to <200kpps for IPv6, I SS> don't think "not completely functional" is an adequate SS> description. To me, that falls into the "not supported" SS> category. Okay, I'll make a fool of myself on-list -- certainly not the first time. ;-) Why not use the highest-order 32 bits of an IPv6 address for interdomain routing... i.e., "overlay" them on IPv4 addresses and/or a 32-bit ASN? Yes, it smells of classful routing. Call me shortsighted, but how many billion interdomain routing policies do we really need? Probably OT, but seems semi-fitting for the thread. Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <email@example.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.