North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: Just a quick thought...
email@example.com wrote: > intellectual property issues? the IETF could not get change control > on V8? :) Vroooooooooooom <grin> But ford has a /8 in IPv4 so they surely would like it if the protocol carried their name too :) > > I haven't had time to look, but just for my clarification, > > why was IPv8 not pursued further. I remember there was a discussion on IPv6 > > vs IPv8 and the argument to go directly to IPv8 instead, but I had to drop > > out from following the discussions since. http://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers : 8 PIP The P Internet Protocol [PXF] eg: http://ntrg.cs.tcd.ie/undergrad/4ba2/ipng/ian.pip.html http://free.vlsm.org/v01/internet/ietf/00/0019.txt and more if you google around... Greets, Jeroen PS: Nooo... IPv8 and IPv16 mentioned by a certain person have nothing to do with it, even better there is no spec of those :)