North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: [OnTopic] common list sense (Re: Even you can be hacked)
Paul Jakma wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:Why do I have to get two and three copies of each of these?Because you havn't set a Reply-To header? Eg with the list as address?I'm on the list folks, if you send it to the list I'll get it. I don't need a copy to the list and Cc:'s until the end of time.
Really? My responsibility to make sure you control your outbound mail. Got it. Oh. Any suggestions on how to do that using my mailer? And I'll delete the other copy you sent me for you. Where is RFC 2821 is this requirement, by the way? RFC 2822 says it is optional but seems to be less than useful in the context here. -- Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio http://members.cox.net/larrysheldon/