North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: ISP Policies
- From: Tulip Rasputin
- Date: Thu Sep 09 00:51:32 2004
So can you give me an example of why and when would an ISP *not* want its
traffic to flow via some other AS(es). Is it a normal policy to have, and do
most of the ISPs have such policies in place?
Thanks,
Tulip
----- Original Message -----
From: <bmanning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Tulip Rasputin" <tulip_rasputin@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: <nanog@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: ISP Policies
yes.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:58:52AM +0530, Tulip Rasputin wrote:
Hi,
I have a general policy question.
Do the ISPs ever look for some particular AS number in the BGP AS_PATH
and
then decide what action/preference/priority they need to take/give based
on
the AS number(s) present in the BGP AS_PATH_SEQ/SET? For instance, does
it
happen that an ISP receives some BGP paths, but because of some
political,
social, economical, DOS attack, etc. reasons decides that it doesn't want
to accept this path because some particular AS number is present in the
BGP
UPDATE.
Basically, it doesn't want *its* traffic to flow via that particular AS
number(s).
Or, if there is a mutual disagreement between two ISPs, and one doesn't
want his traffic to traverse the other's AS number.
Does this sort of thing ever happen? Are such restrictive policies normal
in the ISP/IX scenarios?
Thanks,
Tulip
|