North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: The entire mechanism is Wrong!
Previously, Christopher L. Morrow (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Alexei Roudnev wrote: > > > > > > If people like Melbourne IT are going to claim they can't act on > > > weekends, it might also be sensible not to allow transfers to be > > > processed between Thursday and Sunday, though honestly I think if you > > > are going to be a registrar, you are going to have to deal with > > > problems over weekends. > > It is their dirty problem - if they can not act on weekend, they can not > > maintain a registry, that's all. > > > > provided their contract requires some form of 24/7 support, and there is > an SLA to manage that requirement. If there isn't then there is no need > for 24/7 support (no contractual reason), it just becomes a business > differentiator for clients when chosing registrar X or registrar Y > > (or so it seems to me) Except those clients get affected when something like this happens.. Even if Company A decided to go with Registrar X because they have 24/7 support, if that domain gets moved to Registrar Y and it was not intended to (malicious intent, technical error, whatever...), it suddenly doesn't matter if they chose X does it? -- Douglas A. Dever email@example.com http://www.getaclue.net/