North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:24:13 PDT, Dave Crocker said: (citing out of order to make a point...) > The input turns out to be markedly minimal, where he comprises 25% of it. Whether Karl is in fact right or a raving net.loon, there is indeed something very wrong with the process if he's 25% of the input. > He even cites the absence of protracted, public dialogue as 'proof' that input > is being ignored. Exactly. This is the Internet, remember? Even a mostly-obvious statement like "ISPs should prevent their customers from leaking rfc1918-sourced addresses" will start a flamefest. So the *lack* of a flame-fest regarding *any* action taken by ICANN should tell you something about the perception of ICANN - even the majority of net.loons have learned it's not worth the effort....