North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd)
PWG> Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 23:56:48 -0400 PWG> From: Patrick W. Gilmore PWG> I was just talking about people setting up anycast name servers, each PWG> of which pointed at a different HTTP server (or other service), to PWG> spread load. In many cases, the two servers are the same. Ah, okay... which again helps demonstrate the lack of coupling between *cast and coherency. A single unicast DNS server can serve split views just as easily. PWG> No, it disproves. You say "it will not / cannot work". Showing you PWG> a working instance in production absolutely disproves your statement. PWG> PWG> You can say "it might break", but that's a different statement. Yes. I misread/misthought "disproves will not / cannot work" as "proves can / will work". Speaking of things that, and people who, are incoherent... ;-) Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita ________________________________________________________________________ DO NOT send mail to the following addresses: email@example.com -*- firstname.lastname@example.org -*- email@example.com Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked. Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.