North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: soBGP deployment
On 23-mei-2005, at 17:39, Randy Bush wrote:
o with sbgp, the assertion of the validity of asn A announcing prefix P to asn B is congruent with the bgp signaling itself, A merely signs the assertion in the bgp announcement.
This is nonsense. Did you even read the soBGP drafts?o with sobgp, the assertion is in an external database with issues such as
In S-BGP the certificates are carried in path attributes, in soBGP in a new BGP message. Other than that, they do not differ in this regard.
And unless the implementations are stupid, it should be simple enough to use a web of trust rather than a fixed trust hierarchy, so the RRs don't (necessarily) come into play.
its the old simplicity vs complexity game yet again
Do I hear you say that S-BGP is less complex than soBGP??