North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Cogent move without renumbering
On Oct 8, 2005, at 8:40 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Let's cut this thread short right here. Since you and Randy clearly have different definitions of "ISPs that matter", can we not spend 100 posts on what would be two people arguing different sides of different points?Randy Bush wrote:most isps that matter are actually at ixen, though they do not exchange large amounts of traffic there. ixen do not much like the gigabits of traffic exchanged between the major isps, and the isps don't particularly wish to expose that traffic to ixen. note that this is a somewhat us-centric view, but does extend somewhat.Unless you have data that is not published, there is no factual support for your initial statement. In the context of the earlier discussion, "ISPs that matter" would be those that have an AS, and are multi-homed, and have PI space.
The sad part is you knew (or at least should have known, if you honestly believe your opinion os worth wasting over 10,000 people's time) what Randy meant.