North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news)
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:39:58 +0200, Daniel Roesen said: > Nope. The ULID is supposed to be static, globally unique. Just not > globally routed. Seperating topology from identification. > > Something I didn't see discussed yet is that shim6 sites would need to > get a globally unique, provider independent /48 or larger... which folks > could start to announce. But I guess that address space would come from > blocks earmarked as "non-routable, it's a bogon, bad IP space, filter in > BGP at first sight!". :-) You know, if you describe it that way too many times, people who are only paying half-attention are going to say "IPv6 has something almost like NAT, only different".