North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: QoS for ADSL customers
- From: Kim Onnel
- Date: Thu Dec 01 04:27:18 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GBAKD3QVhsbZ38VWJP8IcbQ7/YRSBxUgajR076EDqukB4ONnu3a1UxRqXAwG7AuuLPUQy6+WX7sd5x3KHfRjvfTjVBKWhgAV6vCEp7bbtoi+fuU5UbmphZgxosf3lD6ebN7o9qOZ1fgN2L6ckWhE3AuN9hN3Qi8tN1MgsOiau9g=
Can any one please suggest to me any commercial or none solution to cap
the download stream traffic, our upstream will not recieve marked
traffic from us, so what can be done ?
On 11/29/05, Kim Onnel <email@example.com> wrote:
We have Juniper ERX as BRAS for ADSL, its GigE interface is on an old
Cisco 3508 switch with an old IOS, its gateway to the internet is a
7609, our transit internet links terminate on GigaE, Flexwan on the 7600
The links are now almost always fully utilized, we want to do some QoS
to cap our ADSL downstream, to give room for the Corp. customers
traffic to flow without pain.
I'm here to collect ideas, comments, advises and experiences for such situations.
Our humble approach was to collect some p2p ports and police traffic to
these ports, but the traffic wasnt much, one other thing is rate-limiting
per ADSL customers IPs, but that wasnt supported by management,
so we thought of matching ADSL www traffic and doing exceed action is
transmit, and police other IP traffic.
Doing so on the ERX wasnt a nice experience, so we're trying to do it on the cisco.