North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, william(at)elan.net wrote:
It'd be darn difficult to engineer a solution that would end up being deployed in any reasonable time if we don't know the requirements first. Yes, there's a draft -- draft-ietf-rpsec-bgpsecrec-03.txt -- but it has been woefully lacking on the operator & deployment requirements. More people should participate in the effort.On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:Is it really that hard to engineer this solution? We do have several of them proposed (SBGP, soBGP, etc) and new WG is likely to be formed soonIt's now been 2.5 business days since Panix was taken out. Do we know what the root cause was? It's hard to engineer a solution until we know what the problem was.
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings