North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs
Yes, those are already in place and do a really good job (about 40% from the daily stats).
Another 40% get caught by razor, pyzor, our own local spam election database and spamassassin. (less than 1% are viruses)
Its the other 20% which is buggin the hell of our clients... (Mostly New spam format and the dynamic spam with generated images)
I think its more a responsability problem than a technology one.
All our clients sign a U]sage A]cceptable U]se P]olicy. Anybody caught spamming, spam advertising, warezing, illegal downloaded (when BayTSP notify us) get a $500 CDN fine (about $1US) or get disconnected. So we take it seriously (and we applied it at least 15 times last year).
Most ARIN ISP's also take it somewhat seriously (legal issues and such)... Except for those big ones, big lawyers thrump reality/truth anytime.
In summary for now:
The situation is pretty much statu-quo.
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 2/10/06, Alain Hebert <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:--
Alain Hebert email@example.com PubNIX Inc. P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7
tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net fax 514-990-9443