North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
On Mar 4, 2006, at 11:43 AM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Let's hope it means that they'll eventually come up with nicer ways to configure IPv6 stacks in Windows flavors than they have this far...On 3 mar 2006, at 04.13, Marshall Eubanks wrote:I would be surprised if Shim6 going into actual deployed boxes was any faster. So, if Shim6 was finalized today, which it won't be, in 2010 we might have 70% deployment and in 2012 we might have 90% deployment.OTOH Teredo, which isn't even a standard is in more or less all Windows XP boxes....Teredo is described in RFC 4380; it's a Proposed Standard. I should note that Microsoft really believes in IPv6. I wonder what that means for its future....