North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing]
On 6 mar 2006, at 11.10, Per Heldal wrote:
Ok, so shim6 doesn't require a change to the transport layer and it doesn't change the forwarding plane. It does create a mapping state at the end-nodes. So claiming it to be either is probably wrong.On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:35:02 +0100, "Kurt Erik Lindqvist" <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:Isn't the fact that shim6 doesn't affect the forwarding-plane of routersOn 2 mar 2006, at 21.42, Andre Oppermann wrote:Putting routing decisions into the transport layer (4) as it is done or proposed with SCTP and SHIM6 is Total Evilness(tm) in my book.Not that shim6 is a change to transport though, but a change at layer 3...
- kurtis -