North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: OT: Xen
Once upon a time, Stephane Bortzmeyer <firstname.lastname@example.org> said: > On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 04:51:09PM -0600, > Chris Adams <email@example.com> wrote > a message of 17 lines which said: > > unixshell.com claims more service (RAM, disk, monthly transfer) for less > > per month: > > > > http://www.unixshell.com/ > > Apparently, it is no based on Xen which you may find a good or a bad > thing, depending on your requirments. (For instance, Unixshell's offer > is limited to Linux, while Panix allows NetBSD.) Both unixshell and Panix are using Xen. Both have a limited set of OSes they offer. It looks like Panix includes some support, while unixshell charges extra for support. > Virtualization solutions are very different and comparing RAM and disk > is not sufficient. No, but for companies offering similar services (e.g. Fedora on Xen if that is what you are looking for), that's a significant thing to note. -- Chris Adams <firstname.lastname@example.org> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.