North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: NANOG Spam?
- From: Peter Dambier
- Date: Thu Jul 06 13:04:56 2006
Henry Linneweh wrote:
I still comment here periodically when it is prudent to do so, I set this email account specifically for Nanog,
From: Dominic J. Eidson <sauron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2006 8:14:58 AM
Subject: Re: NANOG Spam?
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Sabri Berisha wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:20:04PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come
up with a list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we
plan to set the mod bit on them too very soon.
So people who are 'real' but lurk a loti should reply to this message so
they don't get moderated :)
Having very good experiences with spam filters (I have them all switched off :)
I did not even see the spam. My "manual spamfilter" successfully removed them.
Yes, I remember spam with nanog in the sender field. I receive a lot of
spam from everybody, including myself. That is why it never occured it me
it might not have been faked.
The question would be - if you're hit by the moderation bit, and post a
message that makes it past whatever moderator's criteria.. Do you then
lose the moderation bit, since you how have posted within the last 9
months, and thusly have (unmoderated) access?
Or maybe this is just an exercise in let's-fly-by-the-seat-of-our-pants...
Mine is more a fly-by without pants :)
Having been hit by the lurking bit, you most likely have not spammed or
that bit would not be set in the first place.
Looks like a job for a trunk monkey.
Peter and Karin
Peter and Karin Dambier
Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana
+49(179)108-3978 (O2 Genion)
+49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)