North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, WONG, Yuen-Fung wrote: > > Sometimes earlier this year someone announced this 128/1 and caused > heavy loading to our routers to rebuild the CEF. Would anyone filter > out this route (and other similar routes such as 0/1, 128/1, 0/2, 64/2, > .... up to /4, for example) as bogus routes? Do you not prefix-list customers? That'd have solved this, eh?