North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
AW: that 4byte ASN you were considering...
> > >My point is that if we do NOT introduce a special notation > for ASnums > >greater than 65536, then tools only need to be checked, not > updated. If > >your tool was written by someone who left the company 7 > years ago then > >you might want to do such checking by simply testing it with > large as > >numbers, not by inspecting the code. The dot notation requires that > >somebody goes in and updates/fixes all these old tools. > > I don't agree with you but this is a valid argument. I > suggest you make it to the IESG before they decide. > > Henk > Yes, I agree too. Please make sure to introduce your proposal within time. If you need some (virtual) signatures of supporters just ask on the list :-) Gunther