North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: i wanna be a kpn peer
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:28 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I don't think a spurious prefix directly injected into route-views is proof a network is broken.
It is not proof. No one said it was. And no one said you said it was. :)
That said, I would be grateful if someone showed me I screwed up too - in private. In public, I'm not so sure. Especially if someone only -thought- I screwed up.
One could argue that it is difficult to reach the proper people privately (although "noc@" might be a start, or iNOC-DBA, or ...). One could also argue that public notification is better than no notification. But then one would might want to mention that private channels had been exhausted in one's public notification.
Anyway, this "one" is sorry if that "one" thought one was being curmudgeonly. :)
-- TTFN, patrick