North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:34:59 -0000, "Chris L. Morrow" said: > On Tue, 29 May 2007, John Curran wrote: > > This changeover will not: 1) Fix the routing problem > > inherent with present locator/endpoint binding, nor > > 2) solve your favorite fib/rib/cam/convergence limit, > > nor 3) make the infrastructure inherently either > > easier to operate or more secure. > but ipv6 is more secure, yes? :) (no it is not) Does the relative security of IVp4 and IPv6 *really* matter on the same Internet that has Vint Cerf's 140 million pwned machines on it? Just askin', ya know?