North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
On 10/18/07 12:53 PM, "Jon Lewis" <jlewis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I could see bits of 240/4 perhaps being of use to large cable companies > for whom there just isn't enough 1918 space to address all their CPE > gear...and/or they really want unique addressing so that if/when networks > merge IP conflicts are avoided. I do work for one of those "large cable companies" and no, 240/4 is not useable for us either for the exact same reasons that you pointed out to explain why 240/4 will not work in public space: there are just too many devices that can't easily be upgraded. - Alain.