North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Some thoughts on 240/4
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:00:02 EDT, Leo Bicknell said: > devices have been fixed, or we may find 5%. The problem is we > neither know the timeframe in which we need it, nor do we know how > fast vendors can get it fixed. OK, everybody who thinks 240/4 is a Good Idea: How much ship date slip for the IPv6 features you need are you willing to accept when 240/4 updates blow the schedule? You can have all the IPv6 features you asked for on date X, or you can have it all plus 240/4 on date <X+N days>. What value of N are you willing to accept?